Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-02-13

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER vs SWASTIK ROADWAYS

Citation / case number
SC 1996/79032
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
Respondent
SWASTIK ROADWAYS
Author
Respondent KAPADIA
Bench
S.H. KAPADIA. P.VENKATARAMA REDDI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that sections 57, 58, and 59 of the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 were unconstitutional as they exceeded the legislative competence of the State Legislature under Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision, which found that these provisions improperly treated clearing and forwarding agents as dealers and imposed penalties for tax evasion by their principals. The judgment referenced the precedent set in State of Haryana v. Sant Lal & Anr. [(1993) 4 SCC 380].

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER vs SWASTIK ROADWAYS · Niyam