Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-02-26

BAREILLY DEV. AUTHORITY vs VRINDA GUJARATI

Citation / case number
SC 1996/77746
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BAREILLY DEV. AUTHORITY
Respondent
VRINDA GUJARATI
Author
S. RAJENDRA BABU,AR. LAKSHMANAN,G.P. MATHUR.
Bench
S. RAJENDRA BABU,DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN,G.P. MATHUR.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the legality of the price enhancement for flats under the Kusumanjali Scheme by the Bareilly Development Authority (BDA) as per the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The Court held that the BDA's right to amend the estimated cost, as stated in the brochure and allotment letters, was valid, and the final costing could be adjusted based on actual expenses incurred. The Court upheld the BDA's decision to charge interest on delayed payments, affirming that the respondents were obligated to pay the enhanced amount as per the terms agreed upon during the allotment process.

BAREILLY DEV. AUTHORITY vs VRINDA GUJARATI · Niyam