Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-02-16

State Of H.P vs Narendra Kumar And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 2711
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of H.P
Respondent
Narendra Kumar And Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the acquittal of the accused under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, where the trial court found defects in the sanction order and non-compliance with Rule 18 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955. The High Court upheld the trial court's decision regarding the lack of valid sanction but noted the prosecution's failure to prove the dispatch of seal impressions, which is mandatory. The Supreme Court ultimately held that the acquittal was justified due to the prosecution's failure to meet the required legal standards, affirming the lower court's findings.

State Of H.P vs Narendra Kumar And Anr · Niyam