Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-02-24

State Bank Of Patiala vs Romesh Chander Kanoji & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 2016
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Bank Of Patiala
Respondent
Romesh Chander Kanoji & Ors
Bench
Chief Justice, S.B. Sinha, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the State Bank of Patiala's Voluntary Retirement Scheme (SBPVRS) and the implications of withdrawal of applications under it. The Court held that once an application for voluntary retirement is submitted, it is irrevocable as per Clause 9(i) of the SBPVRS, and the bank's refusal to allow withdrawal post-application submission was justified. The judgment clarified the scope of discretion exercised by the bank in accepting or rejecting applications under the scheme, affirming the legality of the bank's actions in light of the guidelines set forth by the Indian Bank Association.

State Bank Of Patiala vs Romesh Chander Kanoji & Ors · Niyam