Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-02-20

Exphar Sa & Anr vs Eupharma Laboratories Ltd. & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 1682
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Exphar Sa & Anr
Respondent
Eupharma Laboratories Ltd. & Anr
Author
Ruma Pal
Bench
Ruma Pal, P. Venkatarama Reddi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court under Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957, in a suit concerning the trademark 'Maloxine'. The Court held that the High Court had jurisdiction as the appellants conducted business in Delhi and the alleged infringement occurred within its territory. The Court emphasized the importance of territorial jurisdiction in copyright and trademark disputes, affirming the lower court's interim orders in favor of the appellants.

Exphar Sa & Anr vs Eupharma Laboratories Ltd. & Anr · Niyam