Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-02-03

State Of U.P vs Virendra Prasad

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 1517
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P
Respondent
Virendra Prasad
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Allahabad High Court's judgment that the respondent Virendra Prasad was guilty under Section 304 Part II IPC, rather than Section 302 IPC, for the death of a police officer during a raid on a gambling den. The Court found that the act was not premeditated murder but rather a result of sudden provocation, thus justifying the lesser charge. The custodial sentence was limited to the time already served, approximately 8 months, affirming the High Court's decision.

State Of U.P vs Virendra Prasad · Niyam