Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-02-26

Collector Of Central Excise, Patna vs M/S Tata Iron & Steel Company Ltd

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Collector Of Central Excise, Patna
Respondent
M/S Tata Iron & Steel Company Ltd
Author
Ar. Lakshmanan
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, Ar. Lakshmanan, G.P. Mathur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the levy of excise duty on zinc dross and flux skimming produced during the galvanisation of steel sheets, under the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Court held that these by-products are non-excisable goods, affirming the decision in Union of India vs. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. which established that such materials do not attract excise duty. Consequently, the appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise were dismissed, upholding the CEGAT's ruling that the assessee had not violated the Central Excise Rules.

Collector Of Central Excise, Patna vs M/S Tata Iron & Steel Company Ltd · Niyam