Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-12-17

BHANU KUMAR JAIN vs ARCHANA KUMAR &ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2003/4386
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BHANU KUMAR JAIN
Respondent
ARCHANA KUMAR &ANR.
Bench
N. SANTOSH HEGDE, B.P. SINGH & S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the remedies available to a defendant against an ex-parte decree under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, emphasizing that a defendant can seek to set aside such a decree if they can demonstrate sufficient cause for their absence. The Court held that the limitation period for filing an application under this rule is governed by the specific provisions of the Code, and the appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's order that had dismissed the application for being time-barred. The judgment clarifies the procedural rights of defendants in civil suits regarding ex-parte decrees.

BHANU KUMAR JAIN vs ARCHANA KUMAR &ANR. · Niyam