Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-12-08

Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S. Emkay Investments (P) Ltd.&Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 261
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...
Respondent
M/S. Emkay Investments (P) Ltd.&Anr
Author
Ar. Lakshmanan
Bench
S.N. Variava, Ar. Lakshmanan, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of Notification No. 175/86-CE in the context of the use of the brand/logo 'MERINO' by the respondents, who manufacture plywood under their own brand 'Pelican'. The Court held that the use of the 'MERINO' logo, which is owned by a large-scale manufacturer, disqualified the respondents from availing the small scale exemption under clause 7 of the Notification. Consequently, the Court upheld the decision of the Central Excise authorities to deny the exemption and confiscate the plywood, affirming the CEGAT's ruling in favor of the respondents was incorrect.

Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S. Emkay Investments (P) Ltd.&Anr · Niyam