Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-08-10

DURGO BAI vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
SC 2003/1995
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DURGO BAI
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Author
P. VENKATARAMA REDDI
Bench
P. VENKATARAMA REDDI & B.P. SINGH.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, affirming the ten-year imprisonment and fine of Rs.1 lakh for the appellants. Additionally, the Court confirmed the conviction of Phuman Singh under Section 307 IPC for firing at a police party, resulting in a four-year sentence. The Court found that the evidence presented, including the recovery of heroin and cartridges, was sufficient to sustain the convictions, despite the acquittal under the Arms Act due to lack of proper sanction proof.

DURGO BAI vs STATE OF PUNJAB · Niyam