Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-08-17

HARNAM SINGH vs EVEREST CONSTRUCTION CO. .

Citation / case number
SC 2002/16812
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HARNAM SINGH
Respondent
EVEREST CONSTRUCTION CO. .
Author
VENKATARAMA REDDI
Bench
P. VENKATARAMA REDDI & B.P. SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing the criminal complaint under Sections 420, 467, 471, and 474 IPC on the grounds of delay, as the bar of limitation under Section 468 Cr.P.C. does not apply to offences punishable with imprisonment exceeding three years. The Court emphasized that the parameters for taking cognizance of an offence must be assessed under Section 468, and the complaint was maintainable despite the time elapsed since the filing of the original agreement. The Court reinstated the complaint, allowing the appellant to pursue the case.

HARNAM SINGH vs EVEREST CONSTRUCTION CO. . · Niyam