INDER SAIN BEDI (DEAD) BY LRS. vs M/S. CHOPRA ELECTRICALS

The Supreme Court held that the notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act was valid, as it sufficiently terminated the tenancy by specifying the end date and the consequences of non-compliance. The Court emphasized that the appellant's claim for possession was justified due to the respondent's unauthorized occupation beyond the license period. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the appellant's suit for possession was allowed, affirming the right to claim mesne profits.