Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-08-13

Vijay Lata Sharma vs Raj Pal And Anr.

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 4390
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vijay Lata Sharma
Respondent
Raj Pal And Anr.
Author
C.K. Thakker
Bench
G.P. Mathur, C.K. Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 21 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, the Prescribed Authority has the jurisdiction to determine the necessity of parties in eviction proceedings, including third parties claiming interest in the property. The Court affirmed the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's writ petition, thereby upholding the order allowing the impleadment of Thakur Radha Krishnaji Maharaj as a necessary party to ascertain the rightful ownership of the property. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the lower courts' decisions.

Vijay Lata Sharma vs Raj Pal And Anr. · Niyam