Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-08-06

State Of Maharashtra And Ors vs Raghunath Gajanan Waingankar

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 4264
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharashtra And Ors
Respondent
Raghunath Gajanan Waingankar
Author
R.C. Lahoti
Bench
G.P. Mathur, R.C. Lahoti

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to grant freedom fighters' pension to the respondent, emphasizing the need for a liberal interpretation of eligibility criteria as per Government Resolution No. POS-1093/C No. 127/FFS/Desk. The Court noted that the respondent's claims were initially rejected due to lack of primary evidence, but the High Court found merit in his case based on precedents set in Mukund Lal Bhandari v. Union of India and Gurdial Singh v. Union of India. The Court directed the appellants to sanction the pension and pay all arrears owed to the respondent.

State Of Maharashtra And Ors vs Raghunath Gajanan Waingankar · Niyam