Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-08-24

N.T.C. (Wbab And O) Ltd. And Anr. vs Anjan K. Saha

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 4255
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
N.T.C. (Wbab And O) Ltd. And Anr.
Respondent
Anjan K. Saha
Author
D.M. Dharmadhikari
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, D.M. Dharmadhikari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to reinstate the respondent, finding that the dismissal was invalid due to procedural irregularities in the departmental enquiry. Specifically, the court noted the failure to supply the enquiry report to the respondent and the lack of an opportunity to contest the proposed penalty, violating Clause 14(4)(c) of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules, 1946. The court reiterated the principles established in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad & Ors. v. B. Karunakar & Ors., emphasizing the necessity of following due process in disciplinary proceedings.

N.T.C. (Wbab And O) Ltd. And Anr. vs Anjan K. Saha · Niyam