Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-08-10

Durgo Bai & Anr vs State Of Punjab

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 4170
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Durgo Bai & Anr
Respondent
State Of Punjab
Author
P. Venkatarama Reddi
Bench
P. Venkatarama Reddi, B.P. Singh

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, affirming the ten-year imprisonment and fine imposed on the appellants for possession of heroin. Additionally, the Court confirmed the conviction of Phuman Singh under Section 307 IPC for firing at a police party, resulting in a concurrent four-year sentence. The Court found that the trial court's acquittal of Phuman Singh under the Arms Act was justified due to lack of proper sanction proof, thus maintaining the integrity of the convictions under the narcotics and IPC provisions.

Durgo Bai & Anr vs State Of Punjab · Niyam