Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-08-31

Haryana Urban Development Authority & ... vs Surinder Singh

Citation / case number
2004 AIR SCW 4946
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Haryana Urban Development Authority & ...
Respondent
Surinder Singh
Author
S. N. Variava
Bench
S. N. Variava, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Haryana Urban Development Authority and Ghaziabad Development Authority regarding interest rates granted by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The Court reiterated that interest at 18% cannot be uniformly applied and must correlate with actual loss or injury, as established in Ghaziabad Development Authority vs. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65. The Court set aside the National Commission's order, confirming that interest at 15% had already been paid and no further claims could be made by the Appellants, while clarifying that this order should not serve as a precedent for other cases.

Haryana Urban Development Authority & ... vs Surinder Singh · Niyam