Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-04-28

DEEPAK K. PRAHLADKA vs C.J.,P.S.MISHRA(NOWRESIGNED)H.C.CAL.&ANR

Citation / case number
SC 1998/12074
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DEEPAK K. PRAHLADKA
Respondent
C.J.,P.S.MISHRA(NOWRESIGNED)H.C.CAL.&ANR
Author
ARUN KUMAR. Y.K. SABHARWAL
Bench
ARUN KUMAR. Y.K. SABHARWAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's decision finding the appellant guilty of contempt of court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for making scandalous statements against judges. The Court emphasized that the appellant, being a self-proclaimed law researcher, should have known better than to file contempt petitions against judges without substantial evidence. The Court confirmed the six-month imprisonment and fine of Rs. 2,000 imposed by the High Court, stating that such conduct undermines the administration of justice.

DEEPAK K. PRAHLADKA vs C.J.,P.S.MISHRA(NOWRESIGNED)H.C.CAL.&ANR · Niyam