Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-04-29

Raj Kumar Jain & Anr vs Kundan Jain & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 3794
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Raj Kumar Jain & Anr
Respondent
Kundan Jain & Anr
Bench
N Santosh Hegde, B P Singh

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the cancellation of anticipatory bail under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code requires a careful assessment of the circumstances and allegations against the accused. The Court found that the High Court had sufficient grounds to cancel the bail based on the allegations of threats made by the appellants to a witness. Consequently, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the appellants, affirming the need for maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.

Raj Kumar Jain & Anr vs Kundan Jain & Anr · Niyam