Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-04-15

State(Anti Corruption Branch)Delhi & ... vs Dr. R.C. Anand & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 3693
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State(Anti Corruption Branch)Delhi & ...
Respondent
Dr. R.C. Anand & Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the sanction granted by the Governing Body of AIIMS to prosecute the respondent was invalid as it did not follow the President's directive against granting sanction. The Court emphasized that the Governing Body was required to provide a reasoned order if it intended to take a contrary view, which was not done. Consequently, the Court quashed the proceedings initiated against the respondent and vacated the order of suspension, citing a lack of review for its continuance, thereby upholding the principles of fair administrative action under Article 14 of the Constitution.

State(Anti Corruption Branch)Delhi & ... vs Dr. R.C. Anand & Anr · Niyam