Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-04-13

Hira Tikkoo vs Union Territory, Chandigarh & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 3648
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Hira Tikkoo
Respondent
Union Territory, Chandigarh & Ors
Bench
Shivaraj V. Patil, D. M. Dharmadhikari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals against the Punjab & Haryana High Court's judgment regarding the allotment of industrial plots under the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952. The Court held that the Administration of UTC must comply with the statutory provisions and deliver possession of the plots to the allottees, as the land was not legally available for industrial use due to its classification as reserved forest. The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to the rules established under the Chandigarh Lease Hold of Sites and Building Rules, 1973, and directed the Administration to rectify the situation by providing alternative plots to affected allottees.

Hira Tikkoo vs Union Territory, Chandigarh & Ors · Niyam