Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-04-16

B.S. Adityan & Ors vs B. Ramachandran Adityan & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 3448
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.S. Adityan & Ors
Respondent
B. Ramachandran Adityan & Ors
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, Doraiswamy Raju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the complexities surrounding the appointment and resignation of trustees under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC). The Court held that the resignation of trustees and subsequent applications for appointment of new trustees must adhere to the procedural requirements of Section 92 CPC, emphasizing the necessity of judicial oversight in trust management. The Court ultimately dismissed the appeals, affirming the lower court's decisions regarding the management of the trust and the appointment of additional trustees.

B.S. Adityan & Ors vs B. Ramachandran Adityan & Ors · Niyam