Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-04-05

Milkfood Ltd vs M/S Gmc Ice Cream (P) Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 3145
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Milkfood Ltd
Respondent
M/S Gmc Ice Cream (P) Ltd
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
Chief Justice, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, specifically addressing the enforceability of arbitration agreements under Section 34 of the 1940 Act. The Court held that the arbitration clause in the contract was valid and that disputes arising from the agreement must be referred to arbitration, thereby upholding the lower court's decision to stay the suit in favor of arbitration. The judgment emphasized the necessity of adhering to the arbitration process as stipulated in the contract, reinforcing the legal principle that arbitration agreements must be honored.

Milkfood Ltd vs M/S Gmc Ice Cream (P) Ltd · Niyam