Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-04-16

Vishwanath Jhunjhunwala vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 2568
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vishwanath Jhunjhunwala
Respondent
State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, G.P. Mathur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'business' under Section 2(aa) of the UP Sales Tax Act, 1948, ruling that job work does not constitute 'business' for the purposes of obtaining Form 31. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that the appellant's importation of coal for job work was not in connection with its business of refining oil, thus denying the issuance of Form 31. The judgment clarified the distinction between activities classified as business and those considered mere service, reinforcing the statutory requirements for tax compliance.

Vishwanath Jhunjhunwala vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr · Niyam