Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-04-21

Punjab & Sind Bank & Anr vs S. Ranveer Singh Bawa & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 2334
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Punjab & Sind Bank & Anr
Respondent
S. Ranveer Singh Bawa & Anr
Bench
V.N. Khare, S.B. Sinha, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that once an employee accepts payments under a voluntary retirement scheme (VRS), they cannot withdraw their option to participate in the scheme. The Court referenced the principles established in Bank of India v. O.P. Swarnakar, clarifying that the VRS constituted an invitation to offer rather than a binding offer, and that acceptance of benefits creates a legal obligation that precludes withdrawal. Consequently, the Court upheld the decision of the lower courts, affirming that the respondent was not entitled to rescind his acceptance after receiving payments.

Punjab & Sind Bank & Anr vs S. Ranveer Singh Bawa & Anr · Niyam