Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2004

Supreme Court of India · 2004-04-01

Jaipal Singh vs Smt. Sumitra Mahajan And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 2066
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jaipal Singh
Respondent
Smt. Sumitra Mahajan And Anr
Author
S.H. Kapadia
Bench
S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the election petition filed by the appellant under Section 83(1)(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, concerning the rejection of his nomination papers for Rajya Sabha elections. The Court held that the appellant was disqualified under Article 102(1)(c) of the Constitution due to not providing the requisite three months' notice for voluntary retirement as mandated by Rule 16 of the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958. Consequently, the Court upheld the rejection of the nomination papers and dismissed the election petition.

Jaipal Singh vs Smt. Sumitra Mahajan And Anr · Niyam