Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-09-19

M. PRABHULAL vs ASST.DIRECTOR, DTE.,REVENUE INTELLIGENCE

Citation / case number
SC 2002/20121
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. PRABHULAL
Respondent
ASST.DIRECTOR, DTE.,REVENUE INTELLIGENCE
Bench
Y.K. SABHARWAL & B.N. AGRAWAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of the appellants under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, specifically Sections 8(c), 29 read with Section 21, affirming the trial court's sentence of 10 years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1 lakh. The Court addressed the admissibility of confessional statements recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, ruling that while the statements were obtained by non-police officers, they were admissible and not involuntary despite claims of torture. The Court confirmed that the evidence was sufficient to maintain the convictions of the accused involved in the trafficking of heroin weighing 66.1 kg.

M. PRABHULAL vs ASST.DIRECTOR, DTE.,REVENUE INTELLIGENCE · Niyam