Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-09-23

NAWAL SINGH vs STATE OF U.P.

Citation / case number
SC 1999/10713
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NAWAL SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF U.P.
Author
AR. LAKSHMANAN. M.B. SHAH
Bench
DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN. M.B. SHAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the orders of compulsory retirement of Judicial Officers in Uttar Pradesh, emphasizing that the judicial service is not merely employment but involves the exercise of sovereign judicial power. The Court ruled that the integrity and reputation of judges must be beyond doubt, and the subjective satisfaction of the High Court's evaluation regarding their utility is paramount. The Court also noted that the Uttar Pradesh Judicial Officers (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules, 1992, which set the retirement age at 60, do not override the provisions of Rule 56 of the U.P. Fundamental Rules, which mandates retirement at 58, unless exceptional circumstances are proven.

NAWAL SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. · Niyam