Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-09-11

RACHAKONDA VENKAT RAO vs R.SATYA BAI(D) BY LR

Citation / case number
SC 1996/77548
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RACHAKONDA VENKAT RAO
Respondent
R.SATYA BAI(D) BY LR
Author
ARUN KUMAR
Bench
ARUN KUMAR. BRIJESH KUMAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal regarding the nature of the decree dated 13th July, 1978, under Order XXIII Rule 3 and Order XXVI Rules 13 and 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court held that the decree was a final decree, allowing the plaintiff's application for the appointment of a Commissioner to partition the joint family properties by metes and bounds. The Court emphasized that the passage of time and subsequent family arrangements did not negate the need for executing the final decree as per the original compromise.

RACHAKONDA VENKAT RAO vs R.SATYA BAI(D) BY LR · Niyam