V.K. Majotra vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. [Alongwith ...

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's interpretation of Section 6(2)(a) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, stating that only a sitting or retired High Court Judge or an advocate qualified for such appointment can serve as Vice-Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Court emphasized the necessity of having presiding officers with a legal background to maintain public confidence in the Tribunal's independence, aligning with Article 50 of the Constitution of India. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the High Court's directive for compliance in future appointments.