Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-09-18

M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India And Ors. On Behalf Of ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 800
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.C. Mehta
Respondent
Union Of India And Ors. On Behalf Of ...
Bench
M.B. Shah, B.N. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, in the context of environmental protection concerning the Taj Mahal, reiterated the necessity of compliance with the Environment Protection Act, 1986, specifically Section 3, which mandates environmental clearance for projects affecting heritage sites. The Court emphasized the role of the Monitoring Committee in overseeing the actions of the Agra Mission Management Board and directed that no further reclamation work on the river Yamuna's bed should proceed without proper clearance. The Court held that the State Government must adhere to these directives to protect the integrity of the heritage monuments.

M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India And Ors. On Behalf Of ... · Niyam