Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-09-16

Centre For Public Interest Litigation vs Union Of India & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 3277
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Centre For Public Interest Litigation
Respondent
Union Of India & Anr
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, G.P.Mathur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the government's decision to sell majority shares in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) without Parliamentary approval violates the provisions of the ESSO (Acquisition of Undertaking in India) Act, 1974, the Burma Shell (Acquisition of Undertaking in India) Act, 1976, and the Caltex (Acquisition of Shares) Act, 1977. The Court emphasized that these statutes mandate that the oil distribution business must remain under state control to serve the common good, and disinvestment without amending or repealing these laws is impermissible. Consequently, the Court held that the government must refrain from proceeding with the disinvestment until the relevant laws are appropriately modified.

Centre For Public Interest Litigation vs Union Of India & Anr · Niyam