Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-09-08

Union Territory Of Chandigarh And Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Basandhi And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 3230
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Territory Of Chandigarh And Ors
Respondent
Rajesh Kumar Basandhi And Anr
Author
Brijesh Kumar
Bench
Brijesh Kumar, Arun Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the phrase 'for the time being' in the Union Territory of Chandigarh Employees (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1992, framed under Article 309 of the Constitution. The Court held that the maximum age limit for the post of Assistant District Attorney/Law Officer is 35 years, contrary to the appellant's claim of 30 years. Consequently, the Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order directing the consideration of the respondent's application for appointment despite being over the initially stated age limit.

Union Territory Of Chandigarh And Ors vs Rajesh Kumar Basandhi And Anr · Niyam