Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-09-09

Union Of India vs M/S. V. Pundarikakshudu And Sons And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 3209
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India
Respondent
M/S. V. Pundarikakshudu And Sons And Anr
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
Chief Justice, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the arbitration award under Sections 15, 16, 30, and 32 of the Arbitration Act, emphasizing that an arbitrator's decision must be consistent and free from misconduct. The Court upheld the District Judge's ruling that the arbitrator's award in favor of the appellant was inconsistent with the finding that the appellant caused delays, thus vitiating the award. The Court confirmed the need for fair procedures in arbitration, particularly regarding the introduction of evidence without prior notice to the opposing party.

Union Of India vs M/S. V. Pundarikakshudu And Sons And Anr · Niyam