Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-09-09

V.K. Majotra vs Union Of India & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
V.K. Majotra
Respondent
Union Of India & Ors
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, Ashok Bhan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the qualifications for the Vice-Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 6(2)(a) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, holding that only a sitting or retired High Court Judge or an advocate qualified for such appointment can be eligible. The Court upheld the High Court's directive that future panels must comply with this requirement to ensure the independence and integrity of the Tribunal, aligning with Article 50 of the Constitution of India. The appeals were disposed of in favor of maintaining these qualifications for the Vice-Chairman position.

V.K. Majotra vs Union Of India & Ors · Niyam