Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-09-23

Sukhwant Singh @ Balwinder Singh vs State Through C.B.I

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sukhwant Singh @ Balwinder Singh
Respondent
State Through C.B.I
Author
SANTOSH HEGDE
Bench
N Santosh Hegde, B P Singh

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 120 IPC, Sections 3 and 6(1) of the TADA Act, and Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, affirming the trial court's findings. The Court reiterated that a properly recorded confessional statement, satisfying Section 15 of the TADA Act, can be sufficient for conviction if deemed voluntary and truthful. It clarified that while corroboration is generally required for confessions used against co-accused, exceptions exist where the confession's probative value is strong enough to warrant conviction without it.

Sukhwant Singh @ Balwinder Singh vs State Through C.B.I · Niyam