Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-10-30

Apangshu Mohan Lodh And Ors vs State Of Tripura And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 267
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Apangshu Mohan Lodh And Ors
Respondent
State Of Tripura And Ors
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Gauhati High Court's Division Bench, which set aside the Single Judge's order granting equal pay for equal work to Part-Time Lecturers. The Court found that the principle of equal pay for equal work did not apply as the appellants did not seek regularization or invoke the Minimum Wages Act. The Court emphasized that the Division Bench correctly distinguished the precedent set in Vijay Kumar v. State of Punjab, affirming that the appellants were engaged on a contractual basis and not entitled to the same pay scale as regular faculty.

Apangshu Mohan Lodh And Ors vs State Of Tripura And Ors · Niyam