K.R. Indira vs Dr. G. Adinarayana

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Clause (b) of the proviso to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, emphasizing that separate notices are required for different cheques related to distinct loan transactions. The Court held that a common notice sent by the complainants did not fulfill the statutory requirements, leading to the dismissal of two appeals and the upholding of acquittal. However, one appeal was allowed, finding the respondent guilty under Section 138 due to proper notice compliance in that instance.