Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-10-08

Bharat Chaudhary & Anr vs State Of Bihar & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 4662
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bharat Chaudhary & Anr
Respondent
State Of Bihar & Anr
Bench
N.Santosh Hegde, B.P. Singh

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) allows for anticipatory bail even after cognizance has been taken by a competent court, rejecting the argument that such a situation precludes the exercise of this power. The Court emphasized that the intention of the legislature was to prevent undue harassment of accused persons and that the gravity of the offence and need for custodial interrogation are factors to consider, but do not restrict the granting of anticipatory bail. The Court granted anticipatory bail to the appellants, overturning the High Court's rejection of their application.

Bharat Chaudhary & Anr vs State Of Bihar & Anr · Niyam