Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-11-27

Hindalco Industries Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 989
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Hindalco Industries Ltd
Respondent
Union Of India & Ors
Author
K.G. Balakrishnan
Bench
K.G. Balakrishnan, P.Venkatarama Reddi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 applies only to voluntary closures and not to closures mandated by external authorities, such as the Divisional Forest Officer. The Court clarified that the appellant's closure due to a directive was not an intended closure under the Act, thus the requirement for prior permission was not applicable. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that the conditions imposed for closure were valid under the circumstances.

Hindalco Industries Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors · Niyam