Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-11-17

The Prohibition & Excise Supdt., A.P. & ... vs Toddy Tappers Coop. Society, ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 658
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The Prohibition & Excise Supdt., A.P. & ...
Respondent
Toddy Tappers Coop. Society, ...
Author
Ar. Lakshmanan
Bench
Chief Justice, Ar. Lakshmanan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the amended Rule 24 of the A.P. Excise Rules, which pertains to the licensing of toddy shops, cannot have retrospective effect. The Court found that the suspension of licenses based on chemical analysis conducted after the fact was improper, as the amendment was made through subordinate legislation and lacked retrospective applicability. Consequently, the Court affirmed the High Court's ruling that quashed the suspension orders and show-cause notices issued against the respondents.

The Prohibition & Excise Supdt., A.P. & ... vs Toddy Tappers Coop. Society, ... · Niyam