Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-11-18

Sudhakar V1Thal Kumbhare vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 1036
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sudhakar V1Thal Kumbhare
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra And Ors
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Ar. Lakshmanan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appellant, a member of the Halba tribe, was not entitled to reservation benefits in Maharashtra despite being recognized as a Scheduled Tribe in Madhya Pradesh. The Court emphasized that Article 342 of the Constitution restricts the benefits of Scheduled Tribes to the state in which they are recognized. The Court also referenced the need for disputes regarding reservation benefits to be referred to a Statutory Committee as per the precedent set in Kumari Madhuri Patil v. Addl. Commissioner, Tribal Development. The appeal against the High Court's dismissal was thus rejected, affirming the High Court's decision.

Sudhakar V1Thal Kumbhare vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors · Niyam