Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-05-09

SYNDICATE BANK vs R.S.R. ENGINEERING WORKS .

Citation / case number
SC 1994/10552
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SYNDICATE BANK
Respondent
R.S.R. ENGINEERING WORKS .
Author
G.P. Mathur
Bench
K.G. BALAKRISHNAN SHIVARAJ V. PATIL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Karamjit Singh under Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA), affirming the concurrent sentences of 5 years R.I. for the former and 5 years and 6 months R.I. for the latter. The Court found sufficient evidence of possession of explosive materials and involvement in terrorist activities, rejecting the appellant's claims of non-possession and lack of residence at the site. The judgment emphasized the seriousness of offenses under TADA and the Explosive Substances Act, reinforcing the need for stringent action against terrorism.

SYNDICATE BANK vs R.S.R. ENGINEERING WORKS . · Niyam