Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-03-28

RAJNI KUMAR vs SURESH KUMAR MALHOTRA

Citation / case number
SC 2001/20964
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAJNI KUMAR
Respondent
SURESH KUMAR MALHOTRA
Author
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT. SHIVARAJ V. PATIL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in dismissing the appellant's application under Rule 4 of Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C.) to set aside an ex parte decree. The Court emphasized that the appellant had not been properly served with summons, as there was no proof of notice being sent by registered post, which constituted a special circumstance justifying the setting aside of the decree. The Court allowed the appeal, thereby enabling the appellant to defend the suit.

RAJNI KUMAR vs SURESH KUMAR MALHOTRA · Niyam