Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-03-05

DY.CHIEF CONTROLLER OF IMPORTS & EXPORTS vs ROSHANLAL AGARWAL

Citation / case number
SC 1995/16864
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DY.CHIEF CONTROLLER OF IMPORTS & EXPORTS
Respondent
ROSHANLAL AGARWAL
Author
G.P. MATHUR
Bench
G.P. MATHUR S. RAJENDRA BABU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Special Court (Economic Offences) had jurisdiction only to try offences under the specific Acts mentioned in the Schedule of the notification establishing it, and not under the Indian Penal Code. The Court found that the High Court's decision to discharge the respondents was correct as the Special Court had failed to comply with the procedural requirements of Section 200 Cr.P.C. and lacked jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Consequently, the appeals by the Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Exports were dismissed, affirming the High Court's order.

DY.CHIEF CONTROLLER OF IMPORTS & EXPORTS vs ROSHANLAL AGARWAL · Niyam