Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-03-13

People'S Union Of Civil Liberties ... vs Union Of India & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 2363
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
People'S Union Of Civil Liberties ...
Respondent
Union Of India & Anr
Author
P. Venkatarama Reddi
Bench
K.G. Balakrishnan, P.Venkatarama Reddi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the right to information regarding candidates contesting elections under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, holding that Section 33(B) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 is unconstitutional. The Court emphasized that the right to information is a fundamental aspect of freedom of speech and expression, which is essential for informed voting. The judgment reinforces the notion that citizens have a right to know about public functionaries, thereby enhancing democratic accountability.

People'S Union Of Civil Liberties ... vs Union Of India & Anr · Niyam