Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-03-05

Dy. Chief Controller Of Imports & ... vs Roshanlal Agarwal & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 1900
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dy. Chief Controller Of Imports & ...
Respondent
Roshanlal Agarwal & Ors
Author
G.P. Mathur
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, G.P. Mathur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Special Court (Economic Offences) had jurisdiction to try offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in addition to those specified in the Schedule of the notification establishing the Court. The Court found that the High Court's ruling, which limited the Special Court's jurisdiction to only the specified Acts, was contrary to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, particularly Section 3(4). Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and reinstated the jurisdiction of the Special Court to include IPC offences, allowing the appeals filed by the Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Exports.

Dy. Chief Controller Of Imports & ... vs Roshanlal Agarwal & Ors · Niyam