Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-03-26

Karamjit Singh vs State (Delhi Administration)

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 1311
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Karamjit Singh
Respondent
State (Delhi Administration)
Author
G.P. Mathur
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, G.P. Mathur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of Karamjit Singh under Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA), affirming the sentences of 5 years R.I. for each count to run concurrently. The Court found that the prosecution had established beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was in possession of explosive materials and had facilitated terrorist activities. The judgment emphasized the seriousness of offenses under TADA and the Explosive Substances Act, reinforcing the need for stringent action against terrorism.

Karamjit Singh vs State (Delhi Administration) · Niyam