Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-03-25

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Cus. & C. Ex., Indore

Citation / case number
2003(88)ECC10
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.
Respondent
Commissioner Of Cus. & C. Ex., Indore
Bench
S.N. Variava, H.K. Sema

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that excise duty is payable on parts replaced under warranty, rejecting the argument that such parts have a zero value. The Court clarified that the 'complaint reserve' charged at the time of sale does not exempt the manufacturer from excise duty on replaced parts, as the total price includes this reserve and does not imply a double levy. The Court affirmed that the excise duty applies regardless of whether the part is replaced free of cost during the warranty period.

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Cus. & C. Ex., Indore · Niyam