Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-06-05

STATE OF UTTARANCHAL vs SIDHARTH SRIVASTAVA .

Citation / case number
SC 2001/22234
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL
Respondent
SIDHARTH SRIVASTAVA .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT. SHIVARAJ V. PATIL
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT. SHIVARAJ V. PATIL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the recommendations made by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (UPPSC) prior to the formation of the State of Uttaranchal are binding on the new State under Article 323(2) of the Constitution and Section 78(4) of The Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000. The Court clarified that the new reservation policy of Uttaranchal does not negate the binding nature of the UPPSC's recommendations. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision to direct the State of Uttaranchal to appoint the selected candidates, affirming the legality of the appointments based on the prior selection process.

STATE OF UTTARANCHAL vs SIDHARTH SRIVASTAVA . · Niyam